Slim Fit 3100mah iPhone 8 / 7 Battery Case - Black - Hot Sale

Bring your iPhone 8 / 7 back to life with this sleek, efficient battery case. A 3100mAh capacity provides enough power for at least one full charge, while the slim build and attractive housing ensure your phone looks great in the case.Revive your iPhone 8 / 7 in styleIf that 4-hour phone conversation, epic YouTube marathon or lengthy gaming session has killed your battery, fear not. This sleek, slim battery case will inject some energyback into your device, leaving you free to do the things you need to for longer. Simply slot the phone inside the case, connect the device to the case's Lightning port and watch your battery come back to life.3,100mAh capacity for at least one full chargeThis case's huge 3,100mAh capacity means at least one full power cycle for your iPhone 8 / 7, so you can game, stream and talk to your heart's content - safe in the knowledge you've got another full charge waiting in your case.Durable, resilient construction protects your device from bumps, scrapes and dropsDon't worry if your iPhone 8 / 7 somehow falls out of your grip. This case is constructed from a resilient and durable material, ensuring all-round protection for your device's back and sides. A slightly raised bezel ensures your device's screen is shielded while face-down on a desk or other surface, too.Protective IC technology efficiently preventsshort-circuiting or overchargingYou'll never need to worry about leaving your phone in this case, or even forgetting to take the case off charge. A built-in protective IC circuit efficiently and effectively defends your device against potential short-circuiting or overcharging, so both your iPhone and the case will never take more power than they absolutely need to.Power pass-through charges your phone and the case simultaneouslyYou don't want to remove your phoneevery time you need to charge this case. That's why the case features pass-through power delivery, meaning while you charge the case you can leave your phone inside - still enjoying all the protective and battery-prolonging benefits you would normally enjoy. The protective IC technology built in to the case delivers only the power each device needs, too, so there's no fear of overcharging or damage to your device at all.4 light LED battery status indicatorNever be left wondering how much power you have left with this battery pack. On the bottom of the case sit 4 LEDs which, at the push of a button, indicate the remaining battery life, as well as displaying how much time remains in the charging process.Sleek, elegant aesthetic complements your iPhone 8 / 7Although this is a battery case, the build is surprisingly sleek and form-fitting, perfectly complementing the gorgeous design of your iPhone 8 / 7. This is truly a case which offers astonishing function while not sacrificing an impressive form.Access to all ports, features and controlsAs this case was made specifically for the iPhone 8 / 7, you can be sure of full access to all of your device's ports, controls and connectors - including the volume andpower buttons, stereo speakersand camera.

Note: Samsung lowered its damages request on April 22 after dropping four iPad models from its infringement claims. It now wants $6.07 million for the '239 patent and $158,400 for the '449 patent, bringing the new total to $6.23 million. Apple has argued at pretrial hearings that if the two parties had negotiated royalties, Samsung would have paid an average of $40 per device for the use of five Apple software patents. That level has been deemed extremely high by experts such as Florian Mueller of the popular blog Foss Patents.

The most typical way to determine royalties stems from 1970's "Georgia-Pacific Corp, vs, United States Plywood slim fit 3100mah iphone 8 / 7 battery case - black Corp." In that ruling, the court determined a jury/judge would have to make up a hypothetical scenario where the two companies were forced to negotiate royalties at the time the infringement began, In this latest Apple vs, Samsung trial, the infringement began at the same time Apple was suing Samsung for other infringement (August 2011), Apple is expected to argue that it would have had to negotiate with Samsung while it also was pursuing other cases and while it knew Samsung was copying its devices and hurting its profits, The company would try to get as much money as it could from Samsung in that scenario -- one where it was forced to do something completely against its nature (settle with Samsung)..

Samsung, however, will argue that the rate Apple is requesting is unreasonable and is much higher than what it has granted other companies, such as Motorola. Samsung also will argue that its damages request is more reasonable. What does this mean for consumers?. As with all the patent trials between Apple and Samsung, this trial may not mean much to consumers. However, this time around, the accused devices are some still sold by the companies. Apple has included the Galaxy S3, Samsung's extremely popular smartphone, on its list of infringing products, while Samsung has accused the iPhone 4S. In a worst case scenario, the losing company would face a sales ban. If Google is forced to make changes to Android because of a ruling in favor of Apple, however, that's something consumers could see in their devices.

What does this mean for Apple and Samsung?, As in previous trials, this isn't really about the damages, Both Apple and Samsung generate billions of dollars a year in profits, For Apple, the trial is about pride in its inventions and protecting its position in the market, For Samsung, it's about proving the company is an innovator in its own right, Beyond that, the trial could set precedence for other patent slim fit 3100mah iphone 8 / 7 battery case - black infringement cases in the new mobile world, Who could be called as witnesses?, Most of the witnesses will be experts asked to argue the validity of the patents, but we'll also see some big names in the courthouse, Samsung plans to call Phil Schiller, Apple's head of marketing, to talk about design, development, promotion, marketing, advertising, consumer demand for, and sales of Apple's devices, The company is also set to call Todd Pendleton, chief marketing officer of Samsung Telecommunications America, to testify about Samsung's brand and advertising efforts for devices such as the Galaxy S3..

Other potential witnesses for Samsung could include Samsung Telecommunications America Chief Strategy Officer Justin Denison; Dale Sohn, Samsung executive adviser and former president and CEO of Samsung Telecommunications America; Google programmers and engineers; and various Apple executives. Scott Forstall, Apple's former head of iOS software, may testify via deposition. Apple also has Schiller, Forstall, Pendleton, and Denison on its witness list, as well as Greg Christie, the senior software engineer who invented the '721 slide-to-unlock patent. Christie spoke with The Wall Street Journal earlier this week about how innovative the iPhone was when it launched in 2007.

Other likely witnesses slim fit 3100mah iphone 8 / 7 battery case - black include Tony Blevins, Apple's vice president of procurement, who is expected to talk about Apple's supply chain and manufacturing capacity, Yan Arrouye, the inventor of the '959 patent; Mark Buckley, a financial analyst at Apple; and various Google employees, CNET will be covering the trial as it unfolds, Check back for updates, Updated at 1 p.m, PT on April 22 to reflect changes in the accused devices and requested damages by Samsung, Samsung dropped its infringement claims against the iPad and lowered the amount it wanted from Apple in damages..

The S5 is set to go on sale around the world on 11 April, hitting shop shelves in 150 countries before the month is out. But the wait is too long for impatient South Korean carrier SK Telecom, which has made the phone available today for around 866,800 won. Korean networks were keen to get the S5 into the hands of phone fans early because they're not allowed to sign up new customers in parts of April and May, as punishment from the government for illegally subsidising new customers. The sanctions mean SK Telecom, KT Corp and LG Uplus Crop would have had to sit on their hands as the S5's official release date came and went.

So SK Telecom has defied Samsung and started shifting the S5 early, "We just wanted to provide the device to local users as soon as possible, It is for the good of our subscribers," an official from slim fit 3100mah iphone 8 / 7 battery case - black SK Telecom told Korea Herald, Samsung boss JK Shin said yesterday that the S5 would not go on sale early, but it appears SK has gone ahead anyway, Update, 3:30 a.m, PT: Samsung told CNET today that it has "provided mobile carriers with a limited number of units for marketing and pre-sales activities, but the decision to release the device early in the Korean market was made by the mobile carrier itself, independently of Samsung, We express our regret at this decision and we are working to verify all the facts."It's a heck of an audacious move for a mobile carrier to risk its relationship with the world's biggest mobile phone manufacturer on its own turf -- and it sets a heck of a precedent; I imagine networks and carriers around the world are very curious indeed to see what happens next, I know I am..

Recent Posts